Rekonfigurasi Batas Diskresi Pejabat Administrasi Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/sosial.v4i1.1570Keywords:
Administration, Discretion, Governance, Law, RegulationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the position of statutory regulations as the main limiting framework for administrative discretion in Indonesian administrative law, particularly after the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. The main issue examined is the normative shift caused by the removal of the requirement that discretion must not contradict statutory regulations, which potentially weakens legal certainty and judicial control. This research uses a normative juridical method with a regulatory and conceptualization approach, and is supported by the theory of discretionary justice, balance of legal objectives, and good governance. The findings indicate that the elimination of formal legality requirements transforms discretion from a legally constrained authority into a broader administrative freedom, increasing the risk of abuse of power and weakening the objective standards of judicial review in administrative courts. The study concludes that such a shift undermines the core principles of the rule of law and necessitates constitutional review to restore legal certainty, accountability, and effective judicial oversight.
Downloads
References
Addink, H. (2019). Good governance: Concept and context. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841159.001.0001
Ashfiya, D. G. (2023). Diskursus pergeseran konsep diskresi pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja dan pengujiannya pada peradilan tata usaha negara. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 6(2), 89-104. https://jurnal.peratun.go.id/index.php/jhp
Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012
Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry. University of Illinois Press.
Fauzani, M. A. (2024). The shift in the legal politics of regulating the general principles of good governance in Indonesian legislation. As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law, 31, 1-15. https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/as-siyasi
Fendri, A. (2015). Kebebasan bertindak pemerintah (diskresi) sebagai pewujudan nilai-nilai moral dan etika. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(3), 132-150. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v5i1.2783
Fendri. (2015). Hukum administrasi negara. Rajawali Pers.
Hadjon, P. M., & Tatiek, S. (2025). Argumentasi hukum. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Ishaq. (2017). Metode penelitian hukum dan penulisan skripsi, tesis, serta disertasi. Alfabeta.
Janitra, S. N., & Ispriyarso, B. (2022). Analisis penghapusan syarat "tidak bertentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan" dalam penggunaan diskresi pada omnibus law Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(2), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i2.245-260
Kelsen, H. (1961). General theory of law and state. Russell & Russell.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi, Cet. ke-16). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Pambudi, L. A. (2023). Quo vadis pengaturan diskresi pemerintah pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 115-130. https://review-unes.com/index.php/lawreview
Pound, R. (1941). Social control through law. Yale University Press.
Pratiwi, C. S., et al. (2016). Penerapan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik (AUPB) dalam hukum administrasi negara. Judicial Sector Support Program.
Prayoga, S. (2025). Discretionary authority of government officials: Between administrative efficiency and potential abuse of authority. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 10(1), 1-18.
Radbruch, G. (1950). Legal philosophy (K. Wilk, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Saebani, B. A. (2025). Metode penelitian hukum: Pendekatan yuridis normatif. CV Pustaka Setia.
Saputro, A., et al. (2025). Role of administrative court to resolve administrative disputes in Indonesia: A systematic review. Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies, 3(1). https://risetpress.com/index.php/jplls
Setia Negara, T. A. (2023). Normative legal research in Indonesia: Its origins and approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal, 4(1), 1-14. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/aclj
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2019). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat (Cet. ke-19). RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sri, T. (2025). Urgency of strengthening the general principles of good governance (AUPB) to enforce health administrative law in Indonesia. Audito Comparative Law Journal, 5(1). https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/aclj
Suparto, S., et al. (2024). Administrative discretion in Indonesia & Netherland administrative court: Authorities and regulations. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 4(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i1.320
Taufiqurrahman, M. (2019). Kedudukan diskresi pejabat pemerintahan. Jurnal Retuntum, 1(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v1i01.299
UNDP. (2014). Governance for sustainable development. United Nations Development Programme.
Wahyu, P. (2024). Analisis hierarki perundang-undangan berdasarkan teori norma hukum oleh Hans Kelsen dan Hans Nawiasky. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 2(1), 8-19.
World Bank Group. (2020). Doing business 2020: Comparing business regulation in 190 economies. World Bank Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 SOSIAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
