Persepsi Generasi Z terhadap Efektivitas Aktivisme Digital sebagai Bentuk Partisipasi Sosial

Authors

  • Indira Nazwa Fazrina Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Desy Safitri Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Sujarwo Sujarwo Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i3.746

Keywords:

Digital-Activism, Digital-Technology, Generation-Z

Abstract

The advancement of digital technology has transformed the nature of social participation, particularly among Generation Z, who were raised in a digital ecosystem. This study aims to examine Generation Z's perceptions of the effectiveness of digital activism as a form of contemporary social participation. Using a literature review method, the study analyzes various academic sources to explore the dynamics of digital activism within the context of digital natives. The findings reveal that Generation Z perceives digital activism as an effective tool to express opinions, raise public awareness, and foster solidarity. Digital activism offers accessibility, broad reach, and flexibility in conveying social aspirations. However, challenges such as slacktivism and misinformation remain significant barriers. These findings imply the need for strategic approaches to optimize digital activism as a sustainable instrument for social change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azizah, N., Trisiana, A., & Yulianto, A. (2024). Peran Dinamis Generasi Muda Dalam Mendorong Partisipasi Politik di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Politik ESOLUSI, 07(02), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.32699/resolusi.v7i2.8239

Eihu Katz, Jay G Blumler, M. G. (1973). USES AND GRATIFICATIONS RESEARCH. Opini Publik Quarterly. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/268109

Epafras, L., Suleeman, E., & Yasmine, D. (2022). Dinamika Aktivisme Digital Kaum Muda Indonesia dalam Wacana Kebebasan Beragama atau Berkeyakinan (KBB). Researchgate.Net, 1, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10428810

Iminullah, A., Putri, E., Sukmana, O., Kristiono, R., & Susilo, D. (2024). Pandangan Revolusioner Generasi Z Terhadap Praktik Money Politik : Tinjauan Literatur. AKSIOLOGI: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN ILMU SOAIAL, 5(1), 258–268.

JOhn Cohen and Norman Uphoff. (1980). Participation’s place in rural development: Seeking clarity through apecidicity (pp. 231–235). World Development.

Meja, V., & Kettler, D. (2018). The Problem of Generations. From Karl Mannheim, 24(19), 351–398. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203791318-7

Muhammad Saud, Ida, R., Abbas, A., Ashfaq, A., & Ahmad, A. R. (2020). Media Sosial dan Digitalisasi Partisipasi Politik Pada Generasi Muda: Perspektif Indonesia. Society, 8(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33.019/society.v8i1.160

Nurdiyanti, A., & Hendrayanto. (2023). Aktivisme Partisipasi Sosial Warga Negara Berbasis Digital. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(4), 3530–3539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24815/jimps.v8i4.25985

Putra, T. R., Wahyuni, R. T., Meilani, N., Anjani, M., & Sari, D. K. (2024). Paritisipasi Politik Gen Z: Eksplorasi Peran Media Sosial dalam Pembentukan Kesadaran Politik Remaja. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Dan Politik, 2(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.61476/bpkxy103

Syahputri, I. B., & Katimin. (2024). Pengaruh Aktivis Mahasiswa Dalam Perubahan Sosial Politik. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 7(4), 25–36. https://jayapanguspress.penerbit.org/index.php/ganaya

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. In Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. https://doi.org/10.5325/bustan.11.1.0077

Downloads

Published

2025-05-05

How to Cite

Indira Nazwa Fazrina, Desy Safitri, & Sujarwo Sujarwo. (2025). Persepsi Generasi Z terhadap Efektivitas Aktivisme Digital sebagai Bentuk Partisipasi Sosial. RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 3(3), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i3.746

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.