Dukungan Otonomi Sistem dan Keberlanjutan Penggunaan LMS di Pendidikan Tinggi : Kajian Kualitatif Berbasis Self-Determination Theory

Authors

  • Muh. Haerdiansyah Syahnur Universitas Brawijaya Malang
  • Eko Ganis Sukoharsono Universitas Brawijaya Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i6.1237

Keywords:

Digital Learning Continuance, Higher Education, Learning Management System, Self-Determination Theory, System-Provided Autonomy Support

Abstract

Digital transformation in higher education demands the sustainable use of Learning Management Systems (LMS). However, most previous studies have predominantly focused on cognitive aspects such as perceived usefulness and user satisfaction, overlooking the motivational dimensions that drive long-term engagement. This study aims to explore how System-Provided Autonomy Support (S-PAS)—the degree of autonomy support embedded within the system—shapes users’ continuance intention to use LMS through psychological need satisfaction and autonomous motivation. Employing an exploratory qualitative approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), task-based observations, and critical discourse analysis of institutional policies and system micro-copies across several universities under the coordination of LLDIKTI Region IX Sultanbatara. Thematic analysis revealed that users’ experiences with LMS are influenced by five key dimensions of S-PAS: meaningful choice, rationale provision, non-controlling language, emotional validation, and informational feedback. When the system and policies offer flexibility, empathetic communication, and clear rationales behind instructions, users exhibit higher levels of autonomous motivation and stronger commitment to LMS continuance. Conversely, administrative rigidity, technostress, and opaque surveillance practices undermine psychological need satisfaction and weaken users’ continuance intention. The study extends the application of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to educational technology by introducing S-PAS as a conceptual framework that bridges system design and user motivation. Practically, the findings offer strategic guidance for policymakers and developers to design LMS environments that are more autonomy-supportive, human-centered, and sustainable. Future research is encouraged to quantitatively validate the S-PAS model across diverse institutional and cultural contexts to enhance the generalizability and theoretical robustness of these findings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Bhattacherjee, A., & Lin, C.-P. (2015). A unified model of IT continuance: Three complementary perspectives and crossover effects. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(4), 364-373. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.36

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.97

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322

Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1086/501484

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806

Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. F. (2019). The technostress trifecta: Techno eustress, techno distress and design. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 6-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169

Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2015). Technostress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042

Tarigan, R., & Syahnur, H. (2024). System-provided autonomy support and digital learning continuance among lecturers: Exploring the moderating role of technostress and surveillance perception. Journal of Digital Education and Innovation, 3(2), 55-70.

Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory's basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058

Van den Broeck, A., Howard, J. L., & Gagné, M. (2021). Understanding the bright and dark sides of work motivation: The role of need satisfaction and need frustration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(2), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2486

Van der Heijden, B., & Kocaoglu, D. F. (2021). Understanding employee continuance intention toward digital learning platforms: A self-determination theory approach. Computers & Education, 164, 104112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104112

Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032359

Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767-779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767

Downloads

Published

2025-10-16

How to Cite

Muh. Haerdiansyah Syahnur, & Eko Ganis Sukoharsono. (2025). Dukungan Otonomi Sistem dan Keberlanjutan Penggunaan LMS di Pendidikan Tinggi : Kajian Kualitatif Berbasis Self-Determination Theory. RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 3(6), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i6.1237

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.