Analisis Unsur Perencanaan dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Sebagaimana Pasal 340 KUHP

(Studi Putusan No.709/Pid.B/2019/PN Jmr)

Authors

  • Nyoman Fitriyatun Naziroh Universitas Ibrahimy
  • Syarifuddin Syarifuddin Universitas Ibrahimy
  • Heriyanto Heriyanto Universitas Ibrahimy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v1i6.682

Keywords:

Criminal Acts, Mental Disorder, Premeditated Murder

Abstract

The criminal act committed by the perpetrator of premeditated murder is a very heinous act, because the perpetrator has the heart to kill for certain reasons even though he committed an act that is against the law. Criminal liability for the perpetrators of murder, especially premeditated murder, must be enforced. The problem in this study is how to regulate premeditated murder in Indonesia, the factors that cause the crime of premeditated murder and criminal liability for the perpetrators in the crime of premeditated murder. This study uses a normative juridical research method that collects literature data, namely laws and regulations, law books, judges' decisions, mass media and scientific journals related to the problems discussed in this thesis. The results of the research and discussion in this study are regarding the regulation of premeditated murder in Indonesia, which is listed in article 340 of the Criminal Code, the factors that cause premeditated murder are the revenge factor, personal factor, (mental disorder) situational factor, opportunity factor, willingness factor and criminal liability for the perpetrator in the crime of premeditated murder by looking at the elements of the act of resisting or violating law, the willingness of the defendant to be responsible, the element of guilt, the absence of justifying reasons and the reason for forgiveness are punished with the threat of the death penalty or life imprisonment or a maximum penalty of twenty years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Wisnubroto. (2014). Praktik Persidangan Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pusaka.

Anjari, W. (2015). Penjatuhan pidana mati di Indonesia dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia. Jurnal Widya Yustisia, 1(2), 107–115.

Ayat 28A Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945. (2019). Surabaya: Putra Bahari Agency.

Bambang Poernomo. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Acara Pidana. Liberty.

Echwan Iriyanto, H. (2021). Unsur rencana dalam tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana. Jurnal Yudisial, 14(1), 20.

Husain, F. U. (2014). Implementasi hukuman seumur hidup dalam praktik di Indonesia menurut KUHP. Lex Et Societatis, 1, 133–141.

Najmi, A., Syahrul I., & Dairani, D. (2024). Politik Blater dalam perspektif UU Pemilu No. 7 Tahun 2017. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 725-733.

P.A.F. Lamintang. (1997). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Pasal 28A Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945.

Pasal 340 KUHP tentang Pembunuhan Berencana.

Putusan No. 709/Pid.B/2019/PN Jmr.

Riswandi, R. (2014). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 78/Pid.B/2014/PN.Mks).

Tresyani, E., D.A., K. N., & Kusworoningtyas, Y. (2014). Pelaksanaan pembuktian tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana di persidangan oleh penuntut umum Kejaksaan Negeri Surakarta. Verstek: Jurnal Hukum Acara, 2(2), 155–166.

Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2019). Global Report on Homicide. United Nations.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Preventing Violence: A Public Health Approach. WHO Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Nyoman Fitriyatun Naziroh, Syarifuddin Syarifuddin, & Heriyanto Heriyanto. (2024). Analisis Unsur Perencanaan dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Sebagaimana Pasal 340 KUHP : (Studi Putusan No.709/Pid.B/2019/PN Jmr). Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(6), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v1i6.682

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.