Evaluasi Kebijakan Sekolah Ramah Anak di SD Negeri Kandangan, Kecamatan Krembung, Kabupaten Sidoarjo

Authors

  • Tri Eka Cahyana Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Aris Sunarya Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Sri Kamariyah Universitas Dr. Soetomo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i6.1274

Keywords:

Child Protection, Education Friendly, Inclusive Schools, Policy Evaluation, Safe Environment

Abstract

The Child Friendly School policy is an important instrument in protecting children's rights and preventing violence in educational environments. This research aims to evaluate the implementation of the Child Friendly School policy at SD Negeri Kandangan, Krembung District, Sidoarjo Regency using William Dunn's policy evaluation approach. This research uses qualitative methods with a descriptive approach. Data collection techniques were carried out through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation studies. Research informants were selected using purposive sampling techniques consisting of school principals, teachers, school committees, and students. Data analysis techniques use the Miles and Huberman model which includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The research results show that the evaluation of policy effectiveness achieves a fairly good level of success in creating a safe and comfortable learning environment, although there are still some teachers who use conventional disciplinary methods. The efficiency evaluation shows that schools optimize limited resources through community participation and village government support. The adequacy evaluation identifies the need for improved facilities such as prayer rooms and special rooms for students with special needs. The equity evaluation shows the school's commitment to providing inclusive educational services without discrimination. The responsiveness evaluation shows high stakeholder satisfaction with child-friendly school programs. The accuracy evaluation confirms that this policy is appropriate for inclusive schools that have students with special needs. This research contributes to the development of educational policy evaluation with a focus on child protection in inclusive schools.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amrullah, M., Angela, M. N., Kusumawardhana, M. D., & Hikmah, K. (2022). Analisis Sekolah Ramah Anak dalam standar sarana dan prasarana di SD Muhammadiyah Taman Sidoarjo. Attractive: Innovative Education Journal, 4(2), 305–313.

Anderson, J. E. (2011). Public policymaking: An introduction. (Tidak ada informasi penerbit pada sumber asli).

Berk, L. (2015). Child development. Pearson Higher Education AU.

Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. ERIC.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Dunn, W. N. (2015). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach. Routledge.

Dye, T. R. (1992). Understanding public policy. (Tidak ada informasi penerbit pada sumber asli).

Hallahan, D. E., Kauffman, J. M., & Pullen, P. C. (2013). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education. Pearson Higher Ed.

Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Nomor 8 Tahun 2014 tentang Kebijakan Sekolah Ramah Anak. KPPPA RI.

Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. (2019). Laporan kinerja KPAI tahun 2018. KPAI. http://www.kpai.go.id

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). SAGE Publications.

Makmun, S., & Rohim, R. (2021). Advokasi kelompok disabilitas melalui media sosial. Majalah Ilmiah Dian Ilmu, 20(2), 165–181.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. (Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI Press).

Nugroho, R. (2017). Dinamika kebijakan: Analisis kebijakan publik, manajemen politik kebijakan publik, etika kebijakan publik, kimia kebijakan publik. PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 751–780.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (1993). Curriculum: Foundations, principles and issues. Allyn and Bacon.

Parsons, W. (2008). Public policy: Pengantar teori dan praktik analisis kebijakan (Dialihbahasakan oleh T. W. B. Santoso). Kencana.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation. SAGE Publications.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 78.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 297.

Pinheiro, P. S. (2006). Violence against children (pp. 1–6). ATAR Roto Presse SA.

Putri, Y., & Rahaju, T. (2020). Implementasi kebijakan Sekolah Ramah Anak di SMA Negeri 3 Kota Kediri. Publika, 8(1).

Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press.

Rangkuti, S. R., & Maksum, I. R. (2019). Implementasi kebijakan Sekolah Ramah Anak dalam mewujudkan Kota Layak Anak di Kota Depok. Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi), 8(1), 38.

Raya, S. (2022, Desember 31). Kekerasan Anak dan Perempuan di Sidoarjo tertinggi ketiga se-Jatim. (Tidak ada informasi penerbit pada sumber asli).

Smith, P. K., López-Castro, L., Robinson, S., & Görzig, A. (2019). Consistency of gender differences in bullying in cross-cultural surveys. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 33–40.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. Dalam D. L. Stufflebeam et al. (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 279–317). Springer.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian (7th ed.). Alfabeta.

Susanti, M. H., Rachman, M., & Ananda, A. (2021). Implementasi Sekolah Ramah Anak di SD Ummul Quro Kota Semarang. Integralistik, 32(1), 52–60.

Tarnoto, N. (2016). Permasalahan yang dihadapi sekolah penyelenggara pendidikan inklusi pada tingkat SD. Humanitas, 13(1), 50–61.

UNICEF. (2009). Child friendly schools manual. UNICEF.

Wibowo, A., Nurdin, N. H., & Jatmika, P. P. (2025). Arah baru kebijakan publik. (Tidak ada informasi penerbit pada sumber asli).

Downloads

Published

2025-11-06

How to Cite

Tri Eka Cahyana, Aris Sunarya, & Sri Kamariyah. (2025). Evaluasi Kebijakan Sekolah Ramah Anak di SD Negeri Kandangan, Kecamatan Krembung, Kabupaten Sidoarjo . RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 3(6), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i6.1274

Similar Articles

<< < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)