Komunikasi Publik Humas Terminal Tirtonadi Surakarta dalam Kegiatan Edutrip

Authors

  • Nur’Aini Purwaningsih Universitas Sahid Surakarta
  • Esfandani Peni Indreswari Universitas Sahid Surakarta
  • Rahmat Wisudawanto Universitas Sahid Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i5.1152

Keywords:

Edutrip, Institutional Image, Public Communication, Public Relations, Terminal Tirtonadi

Abstract

Public communication plays a crucial role in delivering targeted transportation information and building a positive image of government institutions in the eyes of the public. One concrete implementation of effective public communication is the Edutrip program, an educational initiative from Surakarta's Tirtonadi Terminal designed to improve public transportation literacy, particularly among students and teachers. This program is not merely an educational visit, but also a strategic tool for Tirtonadi Terminal Public Relations to introduce the terminal's function as a modern and integrated transportation service center. This study aims to analyze the public communication strategies implemented by Tirtonadi Terminal Public Relations in implementing Edutrip, with a primary focus on their interactions with students and teachers as participants. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, the results show that Tirtonadi Terminal Public Relations predominantly applies the Public Information model from Grunig and Hunt (1984), namely by conveying one-way information that is educational and factual. However, in practice, elements of the Two-Way Symmetrical model were also found, particularly through question and answer sessions, discussions, and gathering feedback from participants which were then used as evaluation material for future program improvements. In contrast, the Press Agentry and Two-Way Asymmetrical models did not appear dominant, given that the approach used did not focus on excessive promotion or information manipulation, but rather on objective and dialogical education. This adaptive and responsive communication strategy not only increased participants' understanding of public transportation but also helped shape the positive image of Tirtonadi Terminal as a transparent, professional, and educational public institution. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting an appropriate and contextual communication model in building constructive relationships between public institutions and the community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., & Broom, G. M. (2006). Effective public relations (9th ed.). Pearson Education.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill.

Effendy, O. U. (2003). Ilmu komunikasi: Teori dan praktek. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press.

Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.

Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp. 37-51). Harper & Row.

Lattimore, D., Baskin, O., Heiman, S. T., & Toth, E. L. (2012). Public relations: The profession and the practice (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2011). Theories of human communication (10th ed.). Waveland Press.

McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail's mass communication theory (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurudin. (2007). Pengantar komunikasi massa. Rajawali Pers.

Perloff, R. M. (2017). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003290056-3

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Ruslan, R. (2010). Manajemen public relations dan media komunikasi: Konsep dan aplikasi. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Wilcox, D. L., Cameron, G. T., Reber, B. H., & Shin, J. H. (2015). Think: Public relations (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-08

How to Cite

Nur’Aini Purwaningsih, Esfandani Peni Indreswari, & Rahmat Wisudawanto. (2025). Komunikasi Publik Humas Terminal Tirtonadi Surakarta dalam Kegiatan Edutrip. RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 3(5), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i5.1152

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.