Transformasi Digital dalam Pelayanan Publik: Analisis Tantangan dan Strategi Inovasi Pelayanan Pencatatan Sipil di Era Digitalisasi: (Studi Kasus Penerbitan Akta Kelahiran di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Sidoarjo)

Wawan Sugianto; Amirul Mustofah; Eny Haryati

doi:10.62383/risoma.v3i6.1272

Transformasi Digital dalam Pelayanan Publik: Analisis Tantangan dan Strategi Inovasi Pelayanan Pencatatan Sipil di Era Digitalisasi

(Studi Kasus Penerbitan Akta Kelahiran di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Sidoarjo)

Authors

Wawan Sugianto Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Amirul Mustofah Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Eny Haryati Universitas Dr. Soetomo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i6.1272

Keywords:

Civil Registration, Digital Literacy, Digital Transformation, Regional E-Government, Service Innovation

Abstract

This research analyses the challenges to service innovation in civil registration, specifically the issuance of birth certificates at the Sidoarjo Regency Department of Population and Civil Registration, within the context of governmental digital transformation. Employing a qualitative approach via in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis, the study identifies various obstacles encountered in the process of public service digitisation. The findings indicate that the principal challenges include: (1) resistance to change from both civil servants and the public regarding the digital system; (2) limitations in information technology infrastructure and internet connectivity in rural areas; (3) the digital literacy gap between urban and rural community groups; (4) the complexity of coordination among government agencies within the integrated system; and (5) budgetary constraints for continuous system maintenance and development. The study also found that despite various innovations such as online services, mobile apps, and digital queuing systems, their implementation still faces significant technical and non-technical impediments. These findings contribute to the literature on public sector innovation by revealing the dynamics of e-government implementation at the regency/city level, and offer strategic recommendations for policymakers on optimising the digital transformation of civil registration services. The novelty of this research lies in its comprehensive analysis, which integrates technological, organisational, and social perspectives within the context of local government in Indonesia post-COVID-19 pandemic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alshehri, M., Drew, S., Alhussain, T., & Alghamdi, R. (2012). The effects of website quality on adoption of e-government service: An empirical study applying UTAUT model using SEM. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.2410. https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.2410

Baker, S., Ayala-Orozco, B., & García-Frapolli, E. (2020). Hybrid, public and private environmental governance: The case of sustainable coastal zone management in Quintana Roo, Mexico. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 27(7), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1722764

Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165–176.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286.

Cordella, L. P., Foggia, P., Sansone, C., & Vento, M. (2004). A (sub) graph isomorphism algorithm for matching large graphs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1323804

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017). An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 211–230.

Heeks, R. (2005). Implementing and managing e-government: An international text. SAGE Publications.

Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426.

Hollweck, T. (2015). Robert K. Yin (2014). Case study research design and methods. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(1), 108–110.

Ilyasa’q, N. (2022). Implementation of Village Population Administrative Information System Application (Siapkedesa) in order to provide more efficient services to communities in Rembang District. Academic International Conference on Law Literacy (AICoLCy2024), 51.

Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001

Janssen, M., & Van der Voort, H. (2020). Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102180.

Kusuma, R. P., & Indrayani, E. (2023). The influence of digital literacy on the utilization of the Population Administration and Civil Registration Online Service Information System (Silakas) application in Tanah Laut Regency. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja, 49(1), 76–88.

Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.

Lembaga Administrasi Negara. (2020). Kajian implementasi inovasi pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Pusat Kajian dan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Aparatur IV LAN.

Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2014). Digital government transformation and internet portals: The co-evolution of technology, organizations, and institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 545–555.

Makmun, S. M. S., Suharsono, A. S. A., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2025). A transforming public services towards smart city in the perspective of e-government in Indonesia. Electronic Journal of Social and Political Sciences (E-SOSPOL), 12(1), 54–65.

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385.

Moore, D. S. (1999). The crucible of cultural politics: Reworking "development" in Zimbabwe’s eastern highlands. American Ethnologist. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1999.26.3.654

Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office.

Murdhani, L. A. (2025). The implementation of digital governance in Indonesia: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Scientific Research, 2(01).

Nurmandi, A., & Kim, S. (2015). Making e-procurement work in a decentralized procurement system: A comparison of three Indonesian cities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(3), 198–220.

Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022

Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.

Republik Indonesia. (2013). Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan.

Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik.

Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia.

Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432–448). Routledge.

Rozak, A. R., Rohim, R., & Jatmika, P. P. (2022). Implementasi kebijakan program sistem informasi pelayanan di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Jember. Majalah Ilmiah Cahaya Ilmu, 4(2), 102–114.

Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.

United Nations. (2020). E-government survey 2020: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. UN DESA.

United Nations. (2021). Birth registration and the right of everyone to recognition everywhere as a person before the law. UN Human Rights Council.

West, D. M. (2005). Digital government: Technology and public sector performance. Princeton University Press.

Wibowo, A., Nurdin, N. H., & Jatmika, P. P. (2025). [Judul tidak tersedia]. (n.d.). (Data tidak lengkap—masih perlu judul karya)

Wicaksono, K. W. (2021). Challenges of Indonesia’s decentralization policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2nd International Conference on Administration Science (ICAS 2020), 313–318.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-06

How to Cite

Wawan Sugianto, Amirul Mustofah, & Eny Haryati. (2025). Transformasi Digital dalam Pelayanan Publik: Analisis Tantangan dan Strategi Inovasi Pelayanan Pencatatan Sipil di Era Digitalisasi: (Studi Kasus Penerbitan Akta Kelahiran di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Sidoarjo). RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 3(6), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i6.1272