Intervensi Sosial bagi Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual di Sentra “Handayani” Jakarta Timur

Authors

  • Amalia Diah Kusumawardhani Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Muhammad Sahrul Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/wissen.v4i1.1540

Keywords:

Child Sexual Abuse, Generalist Intervention Model, Qualitative Study, Social Intervention, Social Rehabilitation

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the stages, impacts, and supporting and inhibiting factors of social intervention for child victims of sexual violence at the “Handayani” Center, East Jakarta. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach to obtain an in-depth understanding of the intervention process. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation, and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate that the “Handayani” Center applies the Generalist Intervention Model (GIM) through seven stages: engagement, assessment, planning, implementation, evaluation, termination, and follow-up. The social intervention has a positive impact on children, particularly in improving emotional stability, self-confidence, and social functioning. Furthermore, the intervention supports children’s readiness for social reintegration. Supporting factors include the professionalism of social workers and effective team collaboration, while inhibiting factors consist of high workload, delays in administrative reporting, and limited family support.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Makassar: CV. Syakir Media Press.

Adi, I. (2008). Intervensi komunitas: Pengembangan masyarakat sebagai upaya pemberdayaan masyarakat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Johnson, L. (1994). Social work practice: A generalist approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Kirst-Ashman, K., & Grafton, H. (2009). Understanding generalist practice. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.

Meyer, C. (1995). Clinical social work in the eco-systems perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.

Prjatami, V. (2016). Penanganan anak korban kekerasan seksual. Bandung: Unpad Press.

Putri et al. (2021). Trauma psikologis pada anak korban kekerasan seksual – Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan (UNY)

Rustanto, B. (2015). Penelitian kualitatif pekerjaan sosial. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sheafor, B., & Horejsi, C. (2006). Techniques and guidelines for social work practice. Boston: Pearson Education.

Siporin, M. (1995). Introduction to social work practice. New York: Macmillan.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susilowati et al. (2022). Peran pekerja sosial dalam pemulihan anak korban kekerasan seksual

Tintin. (2020). Intervensi pekerjaan sosial dalam menangani anak korban kekerasan.

Tarigan et al. (2022). Pendampingan sosial terhadap anak korban kekerasan seksual – Jurnal Kesejahteraan Sosial (Kemensos)

Zahirah et al. (2019) – Dampak psikologis kekerasan seksual terhadap anak

Downloads

Published

2026-02-10

How to Cite

Amalia Diah Kusumawardhani, & Muhammad Sahrul. (2026). Intervensi Sosial bagi Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual di Sentra “Handayani” Jakarta Timur. WISSEN : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.62383/wissen.v4i1.1540

Similar Articles

<< < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.