Analisis Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi: Implikasi Putusan terhadap Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia

Authors

  • Alarode Lahoya Simbolon Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i3.770

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Constitutional Law, Human Rights, Legal Procedure, Rulings

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia is a judicial institution with the authority to review laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, resolve disputes between state institutions, decide on the dissolution of political parties, and adjudicate election result disputes. In exercising its authority, the Constitutional Court functions not only as the guardian of the constitution but also as a protector of human rights. This article aims to analyze how the procedural law of the Constitutional Court, as regulated under Law Number 24 of 2003 and its amendments, serves as a crucial instrument to ensure fair, transparent, and accountable proceedings in cases involving constitutional rights. This study adopts a normative juridical approach by examining legislation, legal doctrines, and Constitutional Court decisions that have had a significant impact on the protection of human rights. The analysis reveals that several rulings of the Court have expanded interpretations of human rights, although challenges remain regarding the consistency of procedural application and the effectiveness of decision enforcement. Therefore, strengthening the procedural law of the Constitutional Court is essential for ensuring the substantive and sustainable protection of human rights in Indonesia.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahyar, S. W. (2023). The socio-cultural role of the community upon formation of legislation (A review of the Electoral Act). International Conference on The State, Law, Politics & Democracy (ICon-SLPD), 570–582.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Benito, A. K., & Kodiyat, M. S. E. I. (2019). Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3.

dkk, E. M. (2017). Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1, 1–17.

Emilka, N., & Nuradanta, F. M. (2022). Penerapan asas audi et alteram partem dalam perkara permohonan pemberian izin poligami. Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 1(2).

Fakrulloh, Z. A. (2023). Legal reforms in Indonesia related to "presidential threshold" of presidential candidate in Law No. 7/2017 concerning general elections. Jurnal Ius Positum (Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement), 58–69.

Falaakh, M. F. (2024). Pertumbuhan dan model konstitusi serta perubahan UUD 1945 oleh Presiden, DPR dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University.

Salmon, H. C. J. (2024). Hukum administrasi negara. Bandung: CV Widina.

Marzuki, P. M. (2020). Teori hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mochtar, Z. A. (2022). Politik hukum pembentukan undang-undang. Yogyakarta: Books.

Riyah, J. (2024). Kedudukan dan wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Justices: Journal of Law, 76–85.

Sidi, A. W. (2025). Eksplorasi metode penelitian dengan pendekatan normatif dan empiris dalam penelitian hukum di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica, 66–72.

Sidi Wiraguna, A. (2024). Metode normatif dan empiris dalam penelitian hukum: Studi eksploratif di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, 5.

Soekanto, S. (1977). Tinjauan buku: Pengantar hukum tata negara Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 3.

Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Metode normatif dan empiris dalam penelitian hukum. Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, 5.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-14

How to Cite

Alarode Lahoya Simbolon, & Sidi Ahyar Wiraguna. (2025). Analisis Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi: Implikasi Putusan terhadap Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia. RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 3(3), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v3i3.770

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.