Strategi Peningkatan Pendapatan Asli Daerah Kota Surbaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/risoma.v4i1.1491Keywords:
Local Own-Source Revenue, Local Tax, Regional Finance, Retribution, StrategyAbstract
This research aims to analyze the strategies for increasing Local Own-Source Revenue (Pendapatan Asli Daerah/PAD) implemented by the Regional Revenue Agency (Badan Pendapatan Daerah/Bapenda) of Surabaya City. As the second largest city in Indonesia and the capital of East Java Province, Surabaya has significant potential for local revenue that needs to be optimized to support regional development. Using SWOT analysis framework and strategic management theory from David, this study examines the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in PAD management, as well as the strategies formulated and implemented to increase revenue. This qualitative research employs a descriptive approach with data collection through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation study at Bapenda Surabaya City during June-August 2025. Informants include agency leaders, division heads, tax and retribution collectors, and taxpayers. The results indicate that Surabaya City has successfully increased its PAD from Rp 5.2 trillion in 2022 to Rp 6.8 trillion in 2024, representing a 31% growth. Key strategies implemented include digital transformation of tax services through e-tax system, intensification of existing tax sources, extensification through identification of new taxpayers, improvement of taxpayer compliance through education and enforcement, and inter-agency collaboration for data integration. The study identifies several challenges including tax evasion, outdated property valuations, and limited human resources. This research recommends strengthening digital infrastructure, updating tax object databases, enhancing taxpayer awareness programs, improving coordination with central government, and developing performance-based incentive systems for revenue collectors.
Downloads
References
Bapenda Kota Surabaya. (2024). Laporan kinerja instansi pemerintah Bapenda Kota Surabaya tahun 2024. Badan Pendapatan Daerah Kota Surabaya.
BPS Kota Surabaya. (2024). Kota Surabaya dalam angka 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surabaya.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2020). Strategic management: A competitive advantage approach, concepts and cases (17th ed.). Pearson.
Halim, A. (2020). Manajemen keuangan sektor publik: Problematika penerimaan dan pengeluaran pemerintah (Edisi revisi). Salemba Empat.
Halim, A., & Kusufi, M. S. (2021). Akuntansi sektor publik: Akuntansi keuangan daerah (Edisi revisi). Salemba Empat.
Hartono, B., & Wijaya, A. (2023). Pengaruh kapasitas SDM dan sistem insentif terhadap kinerja pemungutan pajak daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 13(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.21776/jap.2023.13.2.05
Kurniawan, D. (2023). Studi komparatif pengelolaan pendapatan asli daerah di kota metropolitan Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 14(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.31258/jkp.14.1.45-62
Mardiasmo. (2021). Otonomi dan manajemen keuangan daerah (Edisi revisi). Andi Offset.
Mardiasmo. (2021). Perpajakan (Edisi revisi). Andi Offset.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4), 349–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9
Rahmawati, D., & Santoso, B. (2024). Efektivitas pendekatan berbasis risiko dalam pemeriksaan pajak daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Publik, 10(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.24198/jakp.v10i1.34567
Rangkuti, F. (2021). Analisis SWOT: Teknik membedah kasus bisnis (Edisi revisi). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Republik Indonesia. (2007). Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana. Sekretariat Negara.
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. Sekretariat Negara.
Republik Indonesia. (2013). Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan atas UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan. Sekretariat Negara.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Sedarmayanti. (2020). Reformasi administrasi publik, reformasi birokrasi, dan kepemimpinan masa depan (Edisi revisi). Refika Aditama.
Suwarno, Y., & Pramudya, A. (2022). Inovasi layanan keliling Disdukcapil: Peningkatan aksesibilitas dan kepuasan masyarakat. Jurnal Inovasi Pelayanan Publik, 8(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.24198/jipp.v8i2.34567
Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). Transformational change and business process reengineering: Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.010
Wisner, B., Gaillard, J. C., & Kelman, I. (2012). The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction. Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2022). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering quality service: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. Free Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 RISOMA : Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
