Analisis Hukum Penjatuhan Pidana Bersyarat dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan

Studi Putusan Nomor 70/Pid.C/2025/PN Lbp

Authors

  • Josua Sembiring Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah
  • Syahrul Bakti Harahap Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v3i4.1869

Keywords:

Article 364 of the Criminal Code, Community Justice, Judicial Considerations, Petty Theft, Suspended Sentence

Abstract

The crime of petty theft is a legal issue that demands a proportional and fair imposition of punishment. Article 364 of the Criminal Code, a colonial legacy, has had its value limit adjusted through Supreme Court Regulation Number 02 of 2012 to Rp 2,500,000.00. In Decision Number 70/Pid.C/2025/PN Lbp, the judge imposed a conditional sentence on the perpetrator of rubber sap theft valued at Rp 372,000.00. This study aims to analyze the legal regulation of petty theft, the judge's legal considerations in imposing a conditional sentence, and the conformity of the sentencing with the objectives of punishment and the sense of justice in society. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach, supported by field research through interviews, analyzed qualitatively and descriptively. The results show that the regulation of petty theft under Article 364 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Supreme Court Regulation Number 02 of 2012 provides legal certainty in classifying theft cases with small losses to be tried under expedited proceedings by a single judge without detention. The judge's legal considerations in imposing a conditional sentence are based on the fulfillment of all elements of Article 364 of the Criminal Code and the requirements of Article 14a paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, taking into account the defendant's status as a first-time offender, the small value of the loss, and the modern sentencing paradigm oriented towards rehabilitation. The sentencing in this decision is in accordance with the objectives of modern punishment and the sense of justice in society, and has a strong constitutional foundation in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study suggests reform of the value limit for petty theft, improved coordination among law enforcement officials, and optimization of the application of special conditions in conditional sentences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arief, B. N. (2010). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam menanggulangi kejahatan. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik kriminal 2024. BPS.

Hamzah, A. (2010). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Hamzah, A. (2015). Delik-delik tertentu (speciale delicten) di dalam KUHP. Sinar Grafika.

Ibrahim, J. (2012). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.

Lamintang. (2013). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana Indonesia. Sinar Baru.

Mertokusumo, S. (2007). Mengenal hukum: Suatu pengantar. Liberty.

Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Mulyadi, L. (2014). Putusan hakim dalam hukum acara pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Muladi. (1995). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Alumni.

Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 02 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan dan Jumlah Denda dalam KUHP.

Priyatno, D. (2013). Sistem pelaksanaan pidana penjara di Indonesia. Refika Aditama.

Pusat Informasi Kriminal Nasional Bareskrim Polri. (2026). Data laporan kejahatan Januari 2026.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Lubuk Pakam Nomor 70/Pid.C/2025/PN Lbp.

Rahardjo, S. (2014). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rifai, A. (2014). Penemuan hukum oleh hakim dalam perspektif hukum progresif. Sinar Grafika.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soesilo, R. (1995). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta komentar-komentarnya lengkap pasal demi pasal. Politeia.

Sunggono, B. (2015). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudarto. (2009). Hukum pidana I. Yayasan Sudarto.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 1).

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1981 Nomor 76).

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1995 tentang Pemasyarakatan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1995 Nomor 77).

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157).

Utrecht, E. (1994). Hukum pidana I. Pustaka Tinta Mas.

Waluyo, B. (2008). Pidana dan pemidanaan. Sinar Grafika.

Zulfa, E. A. (2009). Keadilan restoratif. Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-10

How to Cite

Josua Sembiring, & Syahrul Bakti Harahap. (2026). Analisis Hukum Penjatuhan Pidana Bersyarat dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan: Studi Putusan Nomor 70/Pid.C/2025/PN Lbp. Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(4), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v3i4.1869

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.