Analisis Framing dan Etika Penyiaran terhadap Representasi Pesantren dalam Tayangan Xpose Uncensored Trans7
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v2i5.1257Keywords:
Broadcasting Ethics, Framing Tendensius, Media Literacy, Religious Symbols, ResponsibilityAbstract
This study examines the construction of reality and violations of broadcasting ethics in the Xpose Uncensored Trans7 program in 2025 which displays a negative image of pesantren and kiai. Using a descriptive qualitative approach with the framing analysis of Pan and Kosicki's model, this study reveals the existence of tendentious narrative and visual manipulation, thus giving the impression of harassment of religious symbols. The broadcasts are considered to violate the principles of balance and social responsibility as stipulated in the Broadcasting Code of Conduct and Broadcast Program Standards (P3SPS). The public reaction that emerged through the hashtag #BoikotTRANS7 reflects the increasing public awareness of the importance of ethics in broadcasting practices. This phenomenon shows that the media not only functions as a conveyor of information, but also has a moral responsibility in shaping public opinion in a fair and balanced manner. This study emphasizes the urgency of increasing media literacy and ethical sensitivity in the production of broadcast content, especially those related to the representation of religious groups. Thus, the results of this study are expected to be a reference for broadcasting institutions, media regulators, and the public in encouraging more ethical and responsible broadcasting practices in the digital era.
Downloads
References
Bardoel, J. L. H., & d’Haenens, L. (2004). Media responsibility and accountability: New conceptualizations and practices. Communications, 29(1), 5–25.
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran (Edisi ke-4). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Daymon, C., & Holloway, I. (2011). Qualitative research methods in public relations and marketing communications (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Dhofier, Z. (2011). Tradisi pesantren: Studi tentang pandangan hidup kiai. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Eriyanto. (2012). Analisis framing: Konstruksi, ideologi, dan politik media. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426.
Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage Publications.
Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2012). Pedoman Perilaku Penyiaran dan Standar Program Siaran (P3SPS). Jakarta: Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia.
Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2023). Pedoman Perilaku Penyiaran dan Standar Program Siaran (P3SPS). Jakarta: Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia.
Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2014). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect (3rd ed.). New York: Three Rivers Press.
KPI. (2012). Profil Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia (English profile). Jakarta: Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia.
KPI. (2023). Pedoman Perilaku Penyiaran dan Standar Program Siaran (P3SPS). Jakarta: Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia.
Kusuma, A., & Nugroho, Y. (2019). Media ethics and accountability in Indonesian television journalism. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 8(2), 112–127.
Law No. 32/2002 on Broadcasting. (2002). Republic of Indonesia.
Lull, J. (2000). Media, communication, culture: A global approach (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
McNair, B. (2017). An introduction to political communication (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Nurhadi, Z. (2022). Framing pesantren dalam media daring Indonesia: Analisis representasi dan ideologi. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi dan Opini Publik, 26(1), 45–61.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
Rahmawati, S. (2021). Representasi pesantren dalam pemberitaan media nasional: Analisis framing pada media daring. Jurnal Aspikom, 6(1), 15–27.
Sidiq, F. (2023). The role and challenges of Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) in facing the digitalization era of broadcasting media in Indonesia. International Journal of Linguistics, Communication and Broadcasting, 1(4), 15–19.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383.
von Krogh, T. (2012). Understanding media accountability. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 8(2), 179–195.
Ward, S. J. A. (2011). Ethics and the media: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
