Ketimpangan Moral dalam Praktik Pertambangan di Indonesia: Kritik Antroposentris dan Rekonstruksi Etika Biosentris
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/wissen.v4i2.1724Keywords:
Anthropocentrism, Biocentrism, Environmental Ethics, Mining, Moral InequalityAbstract
Indonesia is recognized as a country with abundant mineral resources; however, the expansion of the mining sector has generated multidimensional moral inequality, encompassing an imbalance in economic benefit distribution between corporations and local communities, disregard for the intrinsic value of nature, and the marginalization of affected communities from decision-making. The dominance of the anthropocentric paradigm, which places humans as the center of value, is the root cause of this problem. This study aims to analyze moral inequality in Indonesia's mining practices, examine the anthropocentric paradigm in natural resource management, and formulate biocentric ethics as a just alternative. A qualitative approach with library research method was employed, collecting data from national scientific journals, official government reports, and environmental ethics literature, analyzed descriptively-critically through content analysis technique. Findings reveal three interrelated dimensions of moral inequality: inequality in benefit and burden distribution, inequality in recognizing the intrinsic value of nature, and inequality in participatory decision-making. A reconstruction of biocentric ethics grounded in the principles of non-maleficence, noninterference, fidelity, and restitutive justice offers a comprehensive value framework to address ecological moral deficits. This study concludes that a paradigmatic transformation from anthropocentrism to biocentrism, through Free Prior and Informed Consent implementation, the polluter pays principle, and care ethics-based governance, is a fundamental step toward ethical and sustainable mining practices.
Downloads
References
Artikel, R., & Utomo, T. (2026). Islam dan pengelolaan sumber daya alam di Indonesia: Kritik atas privatisasi dan eksploitasi. 4, 15–23.
Bimo Nugraha, M. R. (2025). Penyebab dan dampak pertambangan emas ilegal di Kecamatan Rakumpit, Kota Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah: Perspektif antropologi. COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 4(12), 5302–5318. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v4i12.3055
Farhan Setyo Oetomo. (2025). Sentralisasi kewenangan dalam pengelolaan pertambangan atas penurunan peran pemerintah daerah dalam pembaharuan hukum pertambangan. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 2(5), 380–396. https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i5.340
Filsafat, F., & Mada, U. G. (2020). Meninjau ulang sustainable development: Kajian filosofis atas dilema pengelolaan lingkungan. Jurnal Filsafat, 30(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.49109
Hidayat, F., Baroka, R. T., Ananta, K. P., & Pramasha, R. R. (2025). Pengaruh eksploitasi sumber daya alam terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi dan kelestarian lingkungan. Indonesian Journal of Economy and Education Economy, 3(1), 1–5.
Jamaludin, M., Fauzi, M. R., & Hapsari, I. D. (2025). A philosophical critique of anthropocentrism and environmental decolonization in Raja Ampat’s indigenous territories. Education: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan, 5(2), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.51903/kk5azp37
Lalenda, R. P., & Santoso, E. B. (2025). Dampak aktivitas pertambangan nikel terhadap kondisi sosial ekonomi masyarakat Kabupaten Morowali Utara (Kasus pada PT Gunbuster Nickel Industry). Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri.
Nainggolan, F., Vitaloca, I., Azkiya, Z., Hasyim, S. F., Subli, A., & Arifin, M. B. (2025). Pemanfaatan chinampas sebagai rehabilitasi bentuk lain untuk lubang bekas tambang batubara. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Bangsa, 1(12), 2183–2188. https://doi.org/10.59837/jpnmb.v1i12.429
Nugroho, A. R., Kevin, M., Haryanto, S., Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Pusat Kajian Demokrasi, & Konstitusi. (2023). Eksplorasi kritis terhadap ratifikasi perjanjian perubahan iklim. 329–354.
Posogu, M. (2026). Good mining practice vs. realitas lubang tambang: Kritik terhadap tata kelola pertambangan dalam perspektif keadilan lingkungan. 3, 2920–2934.
Prasetyo, M. H., Baderan, D. W. K., & Hamidun, M. S. (2025). Dampak kerusakan lingkungan akibat eksploitasi sumber daya mineral dari kegiatan pertambangan. 2.
Priyono, B. B., Purwantara, S., & Purbani, W. (2025). Biosentrisme dan ekosentrisme: Alternatif pandangan filsafat lingkungan terhadap krisis alam di era antroposentrisme. 8(2), 280–290.
Priyono, B. B., Purwantara, S., & Widyastuti, W. (2025). Biosentrisme dan ekosentrisme: Alternatif pandangan filsafat lingkungan terhadap krisis alam di era antroposentrisme. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 8(2), 280–290.
Putri, N. D., Selviana, D., Heryanti, E., Sigit, D. V., Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Negeri Jakarta. (2025). Kajian literatur: Dampak aktivitas penambangan terhadap biodiversitas dan lingkungan. 126–139.
Rahmadi, D., & Anjani, K. T. (2024). Nusantara Hasana Journal. Nusantara Hasana Journal, 1(7), 132–137.
Rahmatillah, S., & Husen, T. (2018). Penyalahgunaan pengelolaan pertambangan terhadap kerusakan lingkungan hidup di Kecamatan Kluet Tengah. Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum, 7(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v7i1.3969
Totobo, D., Pomalaa, K., & Kolaka, K. (2025). Analisis permasalahan lingkungan lingkar tambang di Kabupaten Kolaka. 4(1), 118–124.
Waniatri, W., Muslihudin, M., & Lestari, S. (2022). Dampak sosial, ekonomi dan lingkungan pertambangan pasir di Desa Luragung Landeuh, Kuningan, Jawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 20(2), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.20.2.279-290
Yuridis, A., & Tambang, P. (n.d.). Edu Manage, 1–10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 WISSEN : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



