Tinjauan Yuridis Mekanisme Peradilan Koneksitas dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia

Komang Mas Bayu Puspayoga

doi:10.62383/konsensus.v3i4.1894

Authors

Komang Mas Bayu Puspayoga Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v3i4.1894

Keywords:

Andrie Yunus Case, Connectivity Judiciary, Criminal Procedure Law, Due Process of Law, Jurisdiction of the Courts

Abstract

The connectivity judicial mechanism is an essential instrument in unifying two distinct judicial systems to avoid jurisdictional conflicts and disparities in court decisions. This study aims to analyze the legal basis of the connectivity judiciary within the Indonesian criminal justice system, harmonize regulatory inconsistencies between the general and military judiciaries, and critically review its implementation in the acid attack case against human rights activist Andrie Yunus. The research method employed is normative legal research utilizing the statute, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of the analysis indicate that Articles 170–172 of Law Number 20 Year 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code provide a renewed affirmation of the resolution of connectivity cases as a legitimate deviation from absolute competence for the sake of effective law enforcement. Following the Pre-Trial Decision Number 62/Pid.Pra/2026/PN JKT.SEL, the opportunity to apply the connectivity judiciary to the Andrie Yunus case is wide open, given the indications of intellectual actors from civilian circles working alongside members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces. Although its implementation on the ground still faces practical hurdles such as subjectivity in determining the gravitational center of loss, potential sector-ego, and a very strict time limit for joint investigation reports of a maximum of 7 days, these challenges are balanced by the policy of a balanced composition of the joint panel of judges under Article 172 to guarantee independence. This study concludes that the connectivity judiciary is a tangible manifestation of the due process of law principle that integrates judicial jurisdictions to achieve justice without compromising legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, M. (2021). Kekuasaan kehakiman dan kompetensi peradilan di Indonesia. FH UII Press.

Atmasasmita, R. (2020). Sistem peradilan pidana kontemporer: Menjaga hak asasi manusia. Kencana.

Effendi, T. (2019). Hukum acara pidana: Integrasi penyelidikan dan penyidikan. Pustaka Pelajar.

Hamzah, A. (2019). Hukum acara pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Handy. (2024). Konsep dan karakteristik peradilan koneksitas. Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, M. Y. (2026). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan hukum acara pidana koneksitas. Sinar Grafika.

Marpaung, L. (2021). Koneksitas dalam hukum pidana: Teori, asas, dan praktik. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Reksodiputro, M. (2018). Sistem peradilan pidana dan hak asasi manusia. Rajawali Pers.

Sofyan, A. (2016). Hukum acara pidana Indonesia: Suatu pengantar. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Susanto, B. (2023). Penerapan peradilan koneksitas dalam perkara pidana yang melibatkan oknum militer. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, 4(2), 112–128.

Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1947 tentang Menyesuaikan Hukum Pidana Tentara (Staatsblad 1934, No. 167) Dengan Keadaan Sekarang. (1947). Staatsblad Tahun 1947 Nomor 39.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer. (1997). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1997 Nomor 84. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 34 Tahun 2004 tentang Tentara Nasional Indonesia. (2004). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 127. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. (2009). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. (2025). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2025 Nomor 20. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Wijaya, A. (2022). Due process of law dalam penegakan hukum pidana militer di Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(1), 45–60.